UPSC 2017 GS-IV · 10 marks · 150 words
One of the tests of integrity is complete refusal to be compromised. Explain with reference to a real life example.
What “Explain” demands
set out how or why something works, with the mechanism made explicit.
The characteristic failure: stating that it works without showing how.
What a top answer must contain
These are the checkable specifics from the marking standard for this question — the actual case, committee, datum or thinker, not an instruction to “give examples”.
- Define integrity as wholeness — conduct matching declared values even when unobserved and costly; distinguish it from mere honesty
- The 'complete refusal' point: integrity admits no partial compromise, because a single exception establishes a price
- A real example is what the question demands, not a hypothetical — Satyendra Dubey (NHAI, 2003), Manjunath Shanmugam (IOC, 2005), Ashok Khemka's repeated transfers, T.N. Seshan enforcing the Model Code
- The institutional counterpart: whistle-blower protection, the Whistle Blowers Protection Act 2014 and why it remains largely unoperationalised
- Balanced close: refusing compromise is not rigidity about means — distinguish principled firmness from obstinacy
The band thresholds and the pre-scored sample answers behind this standard stay private — they are the calibration your copy is placed against.
Now write it, and find out what you actually scored
Attempt this question — typed or photographed — and it is marked against the standard above in under a minute: six parameter scores, a blunt verdict, and the points you missed. 50 free credits on signup, no card.
More from UPSC GS-IV
- 2024 · 10 marksEthics encompasses several key dimensions that are crucial in guiding individuals and organizations towards morally responsible behaviour. Explain the key dimensions of ethics that influence human actions and discuss how these dimensions shape ethical decision-making in the professional context.
- 2024 · 10 marksThe application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view.
- 2024 · 10 marksThe Rules and Regulations provided to all the civil servants are same, yet there is difference in the performance. Positive minded officers are able to interpret the Rules and Regulations in favour of the case and achieve success, whereas negative minded officers are unable to achieve goals by interpreting the same Rules and Regulations against the case. Discuss with illustrations.
- 2024 · 20 marksABC Incorporated's aggressive AI expansion has raised its greenhouse gas emissions 48% since 2019, colliding with its public net-zero-by-2030 commitment. As its newly appointed Chief Sustainability Officer, you must advise the board, which fears losing the AI race to competitors. Identify the ethical issues involved, the options available to you, and justify your recommended course of action.
- 2023 · 10 marksIn the context of work environment, differentiate between 'coercion' and 'undue influence' with suitable examples.