UPSC 2024 GS-IV · 10 marks · 150 words
The application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view.
प्रशासनिक विवेकपूर्ण निर्णयन हेतु एक विश्वसनीय स्रोत के रूप में कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता का प्रयोग एक विवादास्पद विषय है। नैतिक दृष्टिकोण से इस कथन का समालोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए।
What “Critically examine” demands
examine both sides AND arrive at a reasoned judgement; the criticism must be substantive, not a token final paragraph.
The characteristic failure: balanced description that never commits to a view.
What a top answer must contain
These are the checkable specifics from the marking standard for this question — the actual case, committee, datum or thinker, not an instruction to “give examples”.
- For: consistency against human caprice, scale (welfare targeting), Weberian rationality extended — with named uses (facial recognition in policing, PM-KISAN deduplication)
- Ethical objections: opacity vs natural justice (reasoned order doctrine), bias laundering (COMPAS/Dutch childcare scandal as canonical cases), accountability vacuum — Art 14 arbitrariness
- Deontological frame: administrative discretion is a duty that cannot be delegated to an unexplainable system; Kantian respect for persons vs statistical treatment
- Way out: AI as decision-support not decision-maker, human-in-the-loop, algorithmic audits, NITI's Responsible AI principles
- A one-line position taken and defended — 'debatable' invites a verdict, not a survey
The band thresholds and the pre-scored sample answers behind this standard stay private — they are the calibration your copy is placed against.
Now write it, and find out what you actually scored
Attempt this question — typed or photographed — and it is marked against the standard above in under a minute: six parameter scores, a blunt verdict, and the points you missed. 50 free credits on signup, no card.
More from UPSC GS-IV
- 2024 · 10 marksThe Rules and Regulations provided to all the civil servants are same, yet there is difference in the performance. Positive minded officers are able to interpret the Rules and Regulations in favour of the case and achieve success, whereas negative minded officers are unable to achieve goals by interpreting the same Rules and Regulations against the case. Discuss with illustrations.
- 2024 · 20 marksABC Incorporated's aggressive AI expansion has raised its greenhouse gas emissions 48% since 2019, colliding with its public net-zero-by-2030 commitment. As its newly appointed Chief Sustainability Officer, you must advise the board, which fears losing the AI race to competitors. Identify the ethical issues involved, the options available to you, and justify your recommended course of action.
- 2024 · 10 marksEthics encompasses several key dimensions that are crucial in guiding individuals and organizations towards morally responsible behaviour. Explain the key dimensions of ethics that influence human actions and discuss how these dimensions shape ethical decision-making in the professional context.
- 2023 · 10 marksIs conscience a more reliable guide when compared to laws, rules and regulations in the context of ethical decision making? Discuss.
- 2023 · 10 marks'Corruption is the manifestation of the failure of core values in the society.' In your opinion, what measures can be adopted to uplift the core values in the society?