Master Answer WritingSign in

UPSC GS-I · 10 marks · 150 words

The 73rd Constitutional Amendment changed the texture of rural leadership without changing its substance. Critically examine in the context of women's participation in Panchayati Raj.

73वें संविधान संशोधन ने ग्रामीण नेतृत्व का स्वरूप तो बदला, किंतु उसका सार नहीं। पंचायती राज में महिलाओं की भागीदारी के संदर्भ में समालोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए।

What “Critically examine” demands

examine both sides AND arrive at a reasoned judgement; the criticism must be substantive, not a token final paragraph.

The characteristic failure: balanced description that never commits to a view.

What a top answer must contain

These are the checkable specifics from the marking standard for this question — the actual case, committee, datum or thinker, not an instruction to “give examples”.

  • 73rd Amendment (1992) — Art 243D: one-third reservation for women; ~46% elected women representatives today (MoPR data)
  • 'Sarpanch pati' phenomenon — proxy leadership as the substance critique
  • Evidence of substantive change: Chattopadhyay & Duflo study (West Bengal/Rajasthan) on public-goods preferences
  • 20+ states raised reservation to 50% (Bihar first, 2006)
  • Counterpoint: rotation of reserved seats undermines incumbency and experience-building

The band thresholds and the pre-scored sample answers behind this standard stay private — they are the calibration your copy is placed against.

Now write it, and find out what you actually scored

Attempt this question — typed or photographed — and it is marked against the standard above in under a minute: six parameter scores, a blunt verdict, and the points you missed. 50 free credits on signup, no card.

Write this answerSee a marked copy first

More from UPSC GS-I