UPSC 2021 GS-II · 15 marks · 250 words

The jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding lodging an FIR and conducting probe within a particular State is being questioned by various States. However, the power of the States to withhold consent to the CBI is not absolute. Explain with special reference to the federal character of India.

What “Explain” demands

set out how or why something works, with the mechanism made explicit.

The characteristic failure: stating that it works without showing how.

What a top answer must contain

These are the checkable specifics from the marking standard for this question — the actual case, committee, datum or thinker, not an instruction to “give examples”.

  • Base: DSPE Act 1946 s.6 consent (general/specific); police as State List Entry 2 — the federal grounding
  • Friction: ~8-10 states withdrew general consent alleging misuse; 'caged parrot' (SC's phrase, Coalgate)
  • Not absolute because: constitutional courts can order CBI probes without consent (State of WB v. CPDR, 2010); consent withdrawal is prospective
  • Reform close: statutory charter for CBI (Standing Committee 2023), Lokpal oversight — federal comity with accountability

The band thresholds and the pre-scored sample answers behind this standard stay private — they are the calibration your copy is placed against.

Now write it, and find out what you actually scored

Attempt this question — typed or photographed — and it is marked against the standard above in under a minute: six parameter scores, a blunt verdict, and the points you missed. 50 free credits on signup, no card.

More from UPSC GS-II